Can Startups Deliver India’s Demographic Dividend? Entrepreneurship as a Pathway to Inclusive Development
Author: Fiza Manzoor
Introduction
India is at an important stage of its demographic transition, with a large proportion of its population belonging to the working-age group. This creates a significant opportunity for economic growth, but a young population alone does not guarantee a demographic dividend. The benefits of demographic change depend on whether the working-age population can access productive employment, skills, entrepreneurship opportunities and adequate social and economic infrastructure. India’s demographic dividend is closely connected with employment opportunities, healthcare and women’s participation in the labour force. The challenge, therefore, is not only to accommodate a growing working-age population but also to create opportunities through which this population can contribute productively to economic development.
In this context, entrepreneurship and startups have emerged as an important pathway for employment generation, innovation and economic diversification. Startups can create employment directly through new enterprises and indirectly through supply chains, services and markets. Entrepreneurship can also provide an alternative to conventional employment, particularly for young people entering the labour market. However, the contribution of startups to India’s demographic dividend depends on how inclusive and accessible the entrepreneurial ecosystem is for different sections of society.
India’s startup ecosystem has expanded considerably over the past decade. Increasing digitalisation, internet penetration, technological development and institutional support have contributed to the growth of entrepreneurship across sectors such as information technology, fintech, agritech, healthcare, tourism, renewable energy and e-commerce. Government initiatives including Startup India, Digital India and Skill India have also strengthened the policy environment for entrepreneurship.
The scale of this expansion is reflected in recent government data. According to the Press Information Bureau, India had more than 2 lakh DPIIT-recognised startups by December 2025, with around 50% emerging from Tier-II and Tier-III cities. More than 45% of recognised startups also had at least one woman Director or Partner. By June 2026, the number of recognised startups had increased to more than 2.3 lakh. These developments indicate that entrepreneurship is expanding beyond the country’s established metropolitan centres, although access to finance, skills, infrastructure and markets remains important for sustaining this growth.
Entrepreneurship and the Demographic Dividend
Entrepreneurship is particularly relevant to the demographic dividend because young people can become not only job seekers but also job creators. According to the Press Information Bureau, nearly 65% of India’s population is below the age of 35. At the same time, recognised startups had collectively created more than 23 lakh jobs as of April 2026. These figures indicate the growing role of startups in creating employment opportunities for India’s young population.
However, the relationship between entrepreneurship and employment needs to be considered carefully. An increase in the number of startups does not automatically translate into sufficient or high-quality employment. The contribution of entrepreneurship to the demographic dividend therefore needs to be assessed not only in terms of the number of enterprises created, but also through the quality, sustainability and distribution of employment.
A functioning entrepreneurial ecosystem requires the interaction of finance, regulation, human capital, infrastructure, mentorship and markets. The NITI Aayog’s Pathways to Progress: Analysis and Insights into India’s Innovation Story similarly highlights the importance of an enabling ecosystem for startups, including institutional support, incubation, funding, human capacity and linkages between different actors in the innovation system. The report also notes that startup activity remains concentrated in established clusters and that stronger regional innovation ecosystems are needed to extend opportunities beyond these centres (NITI Aayog, 2025).
Access to finance remains an important barrier, particularly for young and first-generation entrepreneurs who may lack collateral, established credit histories and connections with investors. Government programmes such as the Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana, Startup India Seed Fund Scheme and Credit Guarantee Scheme for Startups have attempted to address different stages of the financing gap. However, access to financial support can still involve documentation, institutional appraisal and limited awareness, particularly for entrepreneurs without established business networks.
Skills and entrepreneurial education are equally important. Academic education does not always provide students with practical exposure to opportunity identification, business planning, financial management, market testing and regulatory compliance. Early exposure to entrepreneurship through universities, incubators and mentoring can help young people understand the practical requirements of establishing and managing an enterprise.
Mentorship and networks are particularly relevant for first-generation entrepreneurs. Incubators, industry networks and mentors can help entrepreneurs understand markets, develop business models, access finance and overcome administrative barriers. The NITI Aayog report also highlights the importance of intermediary institutions, incubators and innovation hubs in connecting entrepreneurs with knowledge, infrastructure, investors and other parts of the innovation ecosystem (NITI Aayog, 2025).
Gender and Regional Dimensions
Gender is another important dimension of an inclusive startup ecosystem. Increasing women’s participation in economic activity is essential to fully utilise India’s demographic potential. Women entrepreneurs can face additional constraints such as limited mobility, domestic responsibilities, restricted networks and difficulties in accessing finance. The participation of women in recognised startups has increased, with more than 45% of DPIIT-recognised startups having at least one woman Director or Partner as of December 2025. However, representation in recognised startups does not by itself indicate that all women entrepreneurs have equal access to capital, markets, mentorship and institutional support.
The geographical distribution of entrepreneurial opportunities is also important. India’s startup ecosystem has historically been stronger in metropolitan centres where universities, investors, incubators, skilled workers and markets are concentrated. Although around half of recognised startups now originate from Tier-II and Tier-III cities, differences in incubation capacity, investment networks and infrastructure remain relevant.
The experience of Jammu and Kashmir illustrates these regional differences. The region has potential in sectors such as tourism, horticulture, handicrafts, agriculture, food processing and digital services. However, entrepreneurs have also faced constraints related to infrastructure, finance, market access, mentorship, policy awareness and institutional support.
The NITI Aayog report identifies the Jammu and Kashmir Startup Policy, 2024, as a state-level initiative focusing on seed support, incubation, angel mobilisation and grassroots innovation. The policy aims to incubate 2,000 new startups within five years. This provides an institutional foundation for strengthening entrepreneurship in the region, but its impact will depend on the ability of entrepreneurs to access these forms of support.
The regional difference can also be observed through the distribution of recognised startups. Data from the DPIIT State Startup Ranking Report (2023), as presented in the research, shows that Maharashtra had 16,492 recognised startups and Karnataka had 13,811, while Jammu and Kashmir had 287. These differences illustrate that entrepreneurial opportunities and supporting institutions are not evenly distributed across India.
Government Support and Implementation
Government intervention has become an important component of India’s startup ecosystem. Startup India provides institutional support for recognised startups, while MUDRA focuses on financing micro-enterprises. Stand Up India provides financial support to SC/ST and women entrepreneurs. Atal Innovation Mission promotes innovation through initiatives such as Atal Tinkering Labs and Atal Incubation Centres, while Skill India focuses on skills and employability.
The expansion of these programmes demonstrates that India has developed a broad policy framework for entrepreneurship. However, the existence of programmes does not necessarily ensure equal access to them. Awareness gaps, uneven incubation infrastructure, difficulties in credit delivery and differences in institutional capacity can affect implementation. The NITI Aayog report similarly points to the need for stronger regional innovation ecosystems and greater involvement of institutions located in Tier-II and Tier-III cities.
The experience of Kashmir further demonstrates the importance of implementation and institutional coordination. Institutions such as JKEDI have contributed to entrepreneurship awareness, skill development and startup support, but entrepreneurs continue to face difficulties related to financing, infrastructure, market access, mentorship and administrative processes. This suggests that policy support needs to be accompanied by easier access to financial and infrastructural resources and stronger connections between entrepreneurs, institutions and markets.
Digital infrastructure can also help reduce geographical barriers by connecting enterprises with customers and markets beyond their immediate locations. However, digital access needs to be accompanied by reliable connectivity, logistics, financial literacy and market linkages. Digitalisation alone may not be sufficient to create sustainable enterprises.
Measuring the Impact of Startup Policies
The success of startup policies should not be measured only by the number of enterprises registered or loans sanctioned. Enterprise survival, quality of employment, income generation, women’s participation, regional distribution and socioeconomic mobility can provide a broader understanding of whether entrepreneurship programmes are contributing to inclusive development.
This is particularly important when assessing the contribution of startups to the demographic dividend. A large number of recognised startups and jobs indicates the scale of entrepreneurial activity, but it does not by itself show whether opportunities are equally accessible or whether enterprises can survive and expand over time. Stronger monitoring and evaluation can therefore help identify which forms of support are producing sustainable outcomes.
Conclusion
India’s demographic dividend represents an opportunity, but converting that opportunity into broad-based development requires more than a large working-age population. Startups and entrepreneurship can contribute by creating employment, encouraging innovation, diversifying local economies and providing alternative pathways for income generation.
The growth of India’s startup ecosystem, including its expansion into Tier-II and Tier-III cities and increasing participation of women, demonstrates the growing importance of entrepreneurship in India’s development process. At the same time, the experience of Jammu and Kashmir shows that regional differences in finance, infrastructure, mentorship, market access and institutional support continue to matter.
Entrepreneurship should therefore be viewed as one component of a broader development strategy rather than as a standalone solution to India’s demographic challenge. Employment, education, skills, infrastructure, financial inclusion and institutional support remain important conditions for ensuring that young people can participate meaningfully in economic development. For regions such as Jammu and Kashmir, strengthening these conditions can help ensure that entrepreneurship contributes not only to the creation of startups but also to sustained and inclusive economic opportunities.
References
Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade. (2023). States’ startup ranking 2023. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.
Jain, N., Goli, S., & Jana, A. (2025). Population age structural transition, demographic dividend and economic growth in India. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 771. here
Jyothsna, C. (2025). Youth entrepreneurship and innovation in India: Opportunities, challenges, and government initiatives. International Journal on Science and Technology, 16(3). here
Marois, G., Zhelenkova, E., & Ali, B. (2022). Labour force projections in India until 2060 and implications for the demographic dividend. Social Indicators Research, 164(1), 477–497. here
NITI Aayog. (2025). Pathways to progress: Analysis and insights into India’s innovation story. Government of India. here
Press Information Bureau. (2026a, January 15). A decade of Startup India: Scaling innovation, shaping India’s growth story. Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Government of India.
Press Information Bureau. (2026b, June 13). Empowered youth, stronger nation: India’s vision for Viksit Bharat @ 2047. Government of India.
Startup India. (2016). Startup India action plan. Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.
Startup India. (n.d.-a). About Startup India initiative. Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.
Startup India. (n.d.-b). DPIIT startup recognition & tax exemption. Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.
Startup India. (n.d.-c). States’ & UTs’ startup policies. Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.